Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZhmR1PWWPvGXGk1veksXfNqoB_euKJxWTqhuBviYfMzA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have you set force_parallel_mode=regress; before running the
> statement?

Yes, I tried that first.

> If so, then why you need to tune other parallel query
> related parameters?

Because I couldn't get it to break the other way, I then tried this.

Instead of asking me what I did, can you tell me what I need to do?
Maybe a self-contained reproducible test case including exactly what
goes wrong on your end?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal ofsuperuser() checks
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning