On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Well, I suppose that can be implemented as an optimization on top of
> what we have, but I think that we should first get this feature right,
> and later we can see about improving it.
Sure, not arguing with that.
> In any case, since the RI
> queries are run via SPI, any unnecessary partitions should get pruned by
> partition pruning based on each partition's constraint. So I'm not so
> certain that this is a problem worth spending much time/effort/risk of
> bugs on.
I doubt that partition pruning would just automatically DTRT in a case
like this, but if I'm wrong, great!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
