Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZeW4W1i3_U+dEBz4YR3E1YrtXBN2o1qzi4X3xZLiVf0g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>      * It's not terribly important to me to be able to run checkers
>        separately.  If I wanted to do that, I would just disable or
>        remove the checker.

Does this requirement mean that you want to essentially associate a
set of checkers with each language and then, when asked to check a
function, run all of them serially in an undefined order?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11