On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 03/10/2014 12:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/10/2014 11:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> I've committed this patch now with a few further tweaks, leaving this
>>>> issue unaddressed. It may well be something that needs improvement,
>>>> but I don't think it's a big enough issue to justify holding back a
>>>> commit.
>>>
>>> Wait, does this mean Changesets is committed? Or only part of it?
>>
>> The core of the feature was b89e151054a05f0f6d356ca52e3b725dd0505e53,
>> but that only allowed it through the SQL interface. The new commit,
>> 8722017bbcbc95e311bbaa6d21cd028e296e5e35, makes it available via
>> walsender interface. There isn't a client for that interface yet, but
>> if you're wondering whether it's time to break out the champagne, I'm
>> thinking probably.
>
> Yeah, that's my thoughts. Although I might wait for recvlogical. Will
> put documentation wordsmithing on my todo list once Andres commits.
Is this your way of announcing that Andres is getting a commit bit, or
did you just mis-speak?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
