Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1
Date
Msg-id 20140310211603.GN4759@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas escribió:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Robert Haas escribió:
> >> I've committed this patch now with a few further tweaks, leaving this
> >> issue unaddressed.  It may well be something that needs improvement,
> >> but I don't think it's a big enough issue to justify holding back a
> >> commit.
> >
> > Hmm, is the buildfarm exercising any of this?
> 
> I think it isn't, apart from whether it builds.  Apparently the
> buildfarm only runs installcheck on contrib, not check.  And the
> test_decoding plugin only runs under installcheck, not check.  Also,
> it's not going to test walsender/walreceiver at all, but that's harder
> to fix.

So the buildfarm exercises pg_upgrade, to some extent, by way of a
custom module,
https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/blob/master/PGBuild/Modules/TestUpgrade.pm
As far as I can tell, test_decoding wants to do the same thing (i.e. get
make check to run).  Is the best option to write a new TestLogical.pm
module for the buildfarm, or should we somehow think about how to
generalize the pg_upgrade trick so that animal caretakers can enable
runs of test_decoding by simply upgrading to a newer version of the
buildfarm script?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1