Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZQJBv74F_eXTcooq2dh7MBn1EdFOJvFf2dm_cneYsWog@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:24 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> But I'm fine if you'd like to move on with the SET ROLE privilege
> instead, as long as we believe it grants a stable set of capabilities
> (and conversely, that if the SET ROLE privilege is revoked, that it
> revokes a stable set of capabilities).

OK.

Here's a rebased v3 to see what cfbot thinks.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid double lookup in pgstat_fetch_stat_tabentry()
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block