Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZOjWXoKv-1E-0Mwnvug_HtM=D+kv=rvbSiFbvcZ8B9XQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Hm, I had the idea that we were already asking ExtUtils::Embed for that,
> but now I see we only inquire about LDFLAGS not CCFLAGS.  Yes, this sounds
> like a promising avenue to pursue.
>
> It would be useful to see the results of
>
> perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts
>
> on one of the affected installations, and compare that to the problematic
> field(s).

Why ccopts rather than ccflags?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables