Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Date
Msg-id 8530.1500996723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm, I had the idea that we were already asking ExtUtils::Embed for that,
>> but now I see we only inquire about LDFLAGS not CCFLAGS.  Yes, this sounds
>> like a promising avenue to pursue.
>> 
>> It would be useful to see the results of
>> perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts
>> on one of the affected installations, and compare that to the problematic
>> field(s).

> Why ccopts rather than ccflags?

I was looking at the current code which fetches ldopts, and analogizing.
Don't know the difference between ccflags and ccopts.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively)partitioned tables
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Testlib.pm vs msys