Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZOY=ksovamsPyBHUt76gbDH_19XZzf_Lkcw2Am9izBOA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL  ("Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]" <KBaker9@its.jnj.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]
<KBaker9@its.jnj.com> wrote:
> My proof of concept code (steps a though e below) avoided any reading or writing to the pipe (and associated handling
ofSIGPIPE), it just relied on postmaster open of PIPE with ENXIO to indicate all is clear.
 

I'm not following.

> Robert, Assuming an algorithm choice is agreed upon in the near future, would you be the logical choice to implement
thechange?
 
> I am happy to help, especially with any QNX-specific aspects, but don't want to step on anyone's toes.

I'm unlikely to have time to work on this in the immediate future, but
I may be able to help review.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Date:
Subject: Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED
Next
From: Mayeul Kauffmann
Date:
Subject: Re: Patching for increasing the number of columns