On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> By my count of people expressing opinions, we had Michael -1, Stephen -1,
> me -0.1 or so, Alvaro +1, Peter -1, presumably +1 from Andrew; and Andres
> made a comment about not waiting, which perhaps Andrew read as a +1 for
> backpatching. So it's not unreasonable for Andrew to have decided that
> it was about tied. Nonetheless, it does seem like a feature and we're
> past feature freeze, so the default assumption ought to be "no backpatch"
> IMO.
Yeah, I would have voted -1 if I'd realized that it was close. Now
we're in a situation where we have patch not everyone likes not only
in master (which is OK, because we've got a year to decide whether to
change anything) but also in v11 (where we have a lot less time).
That's not so great.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
