Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Date
Msg-id 11978.1533073999@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I'm a bit surprised that you decided to push to the 11 branch - the
>> consensus in this thread seem to have gone the other way by my read?
>> Given that that's the rule, and pushing non-fixes is the exception, I'm
>> not particularly ok with just ignoring that?

> +1

By my count of people expressing opinions, we had Michael -1, Stephen -1,
me -0.1 or so, Alvaro +1, Peter -1, presumably +1 from Andrew; and Andres
made a comment about not waiting, which perhaps Andrew read as a +1 for
backpatching.  So it's not unreasonable for Andrew to have decided that
it was about tied.  Nonetheless, it does seem like a feature and we're
past feature freeze, so the default assumption ought to be "no backpatch"
IMO.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?