Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ7+NdYAo07cLz25PmvCj0=C05UdPT+kbo_PWmrcS2DjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> First, I don't think RFC references belong in the release notes, let
> alone RFC links.

Why not?  I think RFC references are a great thing to include in the
release notes, and including links seems helpful, too.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes