Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id 7e787537-5502-d62b-217b-3c41feadda56@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/01/2017 05:40 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> First, I don't think RFC references belong in the release notes, let
>> alone RFC links.
>
> Why not?  I think RFC references are a great thing to include in the
> release notes, and including links seems helpful, too.

I could see not including RFC references in a PR but release notes seem 
to be the perfect place for them.

JD


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] check with serial