On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:20 PM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, could be. Although, the stack trace at issue doesn't seem to show
> > a call to create_incrementalsort_plan().
>
> The changes to gather merge path generation made it possible to use
> those paths in more cases for both incremental sort and regular sort,
> so by "incremental sort" I read Tomas as saying "the patches that
> brought in incremental sort" not specifically "incremental sort
> itself".
I agree. That's why I said "hmm, could be" even though the plan
doesn't involve one.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
