Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ4dTbkRdZ0dqZk4xmGHzGiikg+hoF4Z9GNy3F7eV-H+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's an updated patch series with some more improvements to the
> isolationtester code, and some better test cases.

OK, here's a final set of patches that I intend to commit in the next
few days if nobody objects, per discussion on the thread about
parallelism fixes.  It's basically the same as the previous set, but
there's a bug fix and an additional test case.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?