Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?
Date
Msg-id 949C052A-D770-4276-859F-55C345F04108@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On February 9, 2016 7:12:23 PM GMT+01:00, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Here's an updated patch series with some more improvements to the
>> isolationtester code, and some better test cases.
>
>OK, here's a final set of patches that I intend to commit in the next
>few days if nobody objects, per discussion on the thread about
>parallelism fixes.  It's basically the same as the previous set, but
>there's a bug fix and an additional test case.

Fwiw, as the person starting the ruckus over there, I think something like isolationtester has a much lower need for
carefulreview, consensus et al than say lock.c and deadlock.c.
 

Andres

--- 
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: schema PL session variables