Re: timezone GUC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: timezone GUC
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ374b_6DyLkYSAhN6FNRULWH8UTQgvmpVhO_ON2resqw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: timezone GUC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: timezone GUC
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Was this dealt with?
>
> Yes, as much as I think is reasonable anyway.  See
> commit e05b866447899211a0c2df31bf0671faac4fc3e5.

I am (and, I think, Alvaro is also) of the opinion that the behavior
here is still not really right.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Cascaded standby message
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup