Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYzYaEb2V+XYrZ1ZURG0Z+WC-UwJ5RTAPfOMSaTPO8A5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be
>> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so
>> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything
>> > backwards.
>>
>> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far:
>
> I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to
> commit this for 9.2.

Is anyone even working on testing it?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, v16
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Syntax error and reserved keywords