Re: Command Triggers, v16 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Command Triggers, v16
Date
Msg-id 7501.1331906502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Command Triggers, v16  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On Friday, March 16, 2012 02:50:55 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> While I'm looking at the grammar ... it also seems like a serious
>> PITA from a maintenance standpoint that we're now going to have to
>> adjust the CREATE COMMAND TRIGGER productions every time somebody
>> thinks of a new SQL command. 

> I don't find that argument really convincing.

Well, how about just plain parser size bloat?  Did anyone look at
how much bigger gram.o becomes with this?  Bigger parser -> slower,
for everybody, whether they care about this feature or not.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, v16
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt