On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-12-01 at 15:48 +0100, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
>> > I don't see why we are trying to accommodate a case where the author
>> > doesn't offer enough full SQL scripts and offers broken downgrade
>> > scripts; or why that case is different from offering broken upgrade
>> > scripts.
>>
>> That's fair enough I guess. I will work on automating the choice of the
>> first full script to use then, for next patch version.
>
> Can we separate this feature out? It's an issue with extensions today,
> and I'm eager to make some progress after the explosion of differing
> opinions today.
+1 for separating that part out. I thought it was separated, at some point.
> Robert, do you think this is an acceptable approach to solve your pet
> peeve here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA
> +Tgmoae3Qs4QbQfxOUzZFxRSxA0zy8ibSOYSuuTzDUMPeAkAg@mail.gmail.com
I'd need to look exactly what's being proposed in more detail.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company