Re: min_recovery_apply_delay - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: min_recovery_apply_delay
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYfO2Ut6YL=FY1fQDEftd2pdcvG04urif17OvBH6+i5eg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: min_recovery_apply_delay  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: min_recovery_apply_delay
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay?
>
> +1

Works for me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird behaviour with the new MOVE clause of ALTER TABLESPACE
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Compression of full-page-writes