Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYRuRUXQ8VKCCts=XVj+OMDcuZum7ShDSwKoTpZV2=isQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Could we name this "postgresql_fdw" instead?  We already have several
> ${productname}_fdw out there, and I don't want to get in the business of
> having to guess variant spellings.

If you don't like variant spellings, having anything to do with
PostgreSQL, aka Postgres, and usually discussed on the pgsql-* mailing
lists, is probably a bad idea.

Go Postgre!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server