Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYP2Lx=e1EbkJo-EVH6nWP8=+Rbu=u3LcnzWvh=VY47zA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 8:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Attached are screenshots of the same segment of table 9.10 as before
> and of the initial portion of 9.30, the patch against HEAD to produce
> these, and a hacky patch on the website's main.css to get it to go
> along.  Without the last you just get all the subsidiary stuff
> left-justified if you build with STYLE=website, which isn't impossibly
> unreadable but it's not the desired presentation.

These seem very nice, and way more readable than the version with
which you started the thread.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: xid wraparound danger due to INDEX_CLEANUP false
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?