Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYK3Ntsaw4LFqApBsA1dKxvWwgZkWNVSoZgAg4H8gpVBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control  (Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control
Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:06 PM Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote:
> Not sure what to do about this, but as people/companies start moving to
> 15, I am afraid we will get people complaining about this. I think
> having exclusive mode still be the default for pg_start_backup() (albeit
> deprecated) in one release and then dropping it in the next was too
> fast.

I completely agree, and I said so at the time, but got shouted down. I
think the argument that exclusive backups were breaking anything at
all was very weak. Nobody was being forced to use them, and they broke
nothing for people who didn't.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN