Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control
Date
Msg-id 5cd54c1e71953d6268ff7f17df7f0d9b7e2a101e.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rename backup_label to recovery_control  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2023-10-16 at 12:12 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:06 PM Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Not sure what to do about this, but as people/companies start moving to
> > 15, I am afraid we will get people complaining about this. I think
> > having exclusive mode still be the default for pg_start_backup() (albeit
> > deprecated) in one release and then dropping it in the next was too
> > fast.
>
> I completely agree, and I said so at the time, but got shouted down. I
> think the argument that exclusive backups were breaking anything at
> all was very weak. Nobody was being forced to use them, and they broke
> nothing for people who didn't.

+1

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving Physical Backup/Restore within the Low Level API
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound