Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYGvNV7GqKLLCYcdFEhiANHA_mXxtf_EB=Pd--y14sMQg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> It has very little impact on this patch, as it has nothing to do with
> columnar storage. That is, each value is compressed independently.

I understand that this patch is not about columnar storage, but I
think the idea that we may want to operate on the compressed data
directly is not only applicable to that case.

> I agree with these thoughts in general, but I'm not quite sure what is
> your conclusion regarding the patch.

I have not reached one.  Sometimes I like to discuss problems before
deciding what I think.  :-)

It does seem to me that the patch may be aiming at a relatively narrow
target in a fairly large problem space, but I don't know whether to
label that as short-sightedness or prudent incrementalism.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Would a BGW need shmem_access or database_connection to enumerate databases?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods