Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoYAoUPpRkEUXu5cZFjZrJbyfLEv13o3O=uh35hGbvKxJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> IMO it's not, and closer analysis says that this patch series is an
>>> attempt to solve something we already fixed, better, in 9.4.
>
>> ... by the same patch submitter.
>
> [ confused ]  The commit log credits 82233ce7e to MauMau and yourself.

IIUC, MauMau = Tsunakawa Takayuki.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?