Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Date
Msg-id 1870.1479503525@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> IMO it's not, and closer analysis says that this patch series is an
>> attempt to solve something we already fixed, better, in 9.4.

> ... by the same patch submitter.

[ confused ]  The commit log credits 82233ce7e to MauMau and yourself.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?