Re: Is this a bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Is this a bug?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY5_gA67NE5u3+YZsWsWXcvdUpiGNV+S5Ai0dRk=razDQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is this a bug?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is this a bug?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Well, it's fairly harmless, but it might not be a bad idea to tighten that
>>> up.
>> The attached patch tighten that up.
> Hm... It might be interesting to include it in 9.4 IMO, somewhat
> grouping with what has been done in a6542a4 for SET and ABORT.

Meh.  There will always be another thing we could squeeze in; I don't
think this is particularly urgent, and it's late to the party.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make it easy to detach completely from shared memory.
Next
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: GSoC proposal. Index-only scans for GIST