On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:11:46AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> > <fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Well, it's fairly harmless, but it might not be a bad idea to tighten that
> >>> up.
> >> The attached patch tighten that up.
> > Hm... It might be interesting to include it in 9.4 IMO, somewhat
> > grouping with what has been done in a6542a4 for SET and ABORT.
>
> Meh. There will always be another thing we could squeeze in; I don't
> think this is particularly urgent, and it's late to the party.
Do we want this patch for 9.5? It throws an error for invalid reloption
specifications.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
