Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yurii Rashkovskii
Subject Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name
Date
Msg-id CA+RLCQx2nDPtMqrC7MbmCCRBwncFrqnaxtz7SvqSAB3WhQuKuw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Nathan,

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 8:12 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:00:12PM -0700, Yurii Rashkovskii wrote:
> Great, thank you! The reason I was leaving the other constant in place to
> make upgrading extensions trivial (so that they don't need to adjust for
> this), but if you think this is a better way, I am fine with it.

Sorry, I'm not following.  Which constant are you referring to?

Apologies, I misread the final patch. All good! 

--
Y.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: ResourceOwner refactoring
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is DATESTYLE, ordering ignored for output but used for input ?