Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name
Date
Msg-id 20230704031226.GA3372172@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name  (Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:00:12PM -0700, Yurii Rashkovskii wrote:
> Great, thank you! The reason I was leaving the other constant in place to
> make upgrading extensions trivial (so that they don't need to adjust for
> this), but if you think this is a better way, I am fine with it.

Sorry, I'm not following.  Which constant are you referring to?

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Is a pg_stat_force_next_flush() call sufficient for regression tests?
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: DSA failed to allocate memory