Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Dave Page
Subject Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxozkzXWPD1ZcNfENevAi1SE1RLJHTZ6AjdVVQ+zXBkT7Kw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Tree view


On Wednesday, May 18, 2016, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 05/18/2016 06:46 AM, Dave Page wrote:


On Wednesday, May 18, 2016, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
<mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:

    On 05/18/2016 06:33 AM, Josh berkus wrote:

        On 05/18/2016 09:07 AM, Martín Marqués wrote:

            El 18/05/16 a las 09:56, Vik Fearing escribió:


                9.6 will be 9.6, the next version will be 10.0 (instead
                of 9.7).


        This is correct.

            I think that 9.7 will be 10, and not 10.0.

            Moving to major.minor versioning.


        This is a strong possibility, but is not yet decided.


    A community vote:

    -1


For what reason?

It is a solution in search of a problem and has more to do with vanity(number envy) then anything. The project has enough legitimate issues on its table without chasing after made up issues.

It is a solution to the issue that every couple of years we waste a ton of man-hours on discussions like this. With a move to a 2 digit number, that stops. 


--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Next
From: Josh berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0