Re: Postgres Pro build for windows - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Postgres Pro build for windows
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxoyBvPfpC+fd1DGOoBJK4f2d5YfZn_EPHY8MMksh1rN+wg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres Pro build for windows  ("Ivan E. Panchenko" <i.panchenko@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: Postgres Pro build for windows  ("Ivan E. Panchenko" <i.panchenko@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-www
Hi On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Ivan E. Panchenko < i.panchenko@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > 23.11.2017 15:15, Dave Page пишет: > > Hi > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Ivan E. Panchenko < > i.panchenko@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >> Hi Magnus, >> >> Sorry for slow reply. Our patch for windows GUI installers page is >> attached. >> > > From looking at the Github page, it looks like you are applying a number > of patches to PostgreSQL. Is that correct? > > Mandatory patches are applied only to 9.2.14 and 9.4.9 versions. > > 9.2.14: a postmaster shutdown when server is killed: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27520.1444682101%40sss.pgh.pa.us > (a patch by Tom Lane, later committed in 9.2 branch) > > 9.4.9: increase isolation between shared memory segments of different > postmaster instances (really a strange thing, probably unnecessary) > Was not commited anywhere. > > We can remove both, we do not want to bother the community with this. > Should we ? > I think so, if we're to list the packages on our main download pages. > > Other patches are applied only when a special environment variable is set, > which is not done by default. > Do you mean they are only applied during the build process if the envvar is set, or that they are activated at runtime if the envvar is set? I think the former is fine, but not the latter. Thanks! > > The reason I ask is that when EDB first started publishing the installers > for postgresql.org, the agreement with the core team members present at > the meeting was that we would be publishing pure, unmodified PostgreSQL. > > EDB never deviated from that policy (despite occasionally wanting to), and > I don't think the community should change it now - if a > fix/feature/whatever isn't in the PostgreSQL tarball, then it shouldn't be > in what are advertised as endorsed "official" builds offered for download. > > For clarity, opinions are my own, and not necessarily those of EDB. > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > > -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Ivan E. Panchenko"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres Pro build for windows
Next
From: Pierre Giraud
Date:
Subject: [pgcommitfest2] Sorting columns