Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Dave Page
Subject Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows
Date
Msg-id CA+OCxoxvXchnAHYZjCLS8XtYU8KasESMSXLYo+X9HyDeVnA_QA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
>>> So Sachin and I have looked at this but not found a problem with the
>>> installers. He then found that one of our colleagues has already
>>> reported this as an issue with PostgreSQL and submitted a possible
>>> patch. So, we need a committer to look at fixing this:
>>
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg00874.php
>>
>> Seems pretty brute-force.  Why not just
>>
>> #if LIBXML_VERSION > 20703
>> #define HAVE_XMLSTRUCTUREDERRORCONTEXT
>> #endif
>>
>> in some suitable place (probably xml.c itself, since I don't think we
>> want to #include xmlversion.h in global headers)?
>>
>> Or actually, maybe we could just unconditionally define
>> HAVE_XMLSTRUCTUREDERRORCONTEXT in pg_config.h.win32.  Is anybody
>> likely to still be building PG with ancient libxml on Windows?
>
> That works for me. Using older libxml's would be a bad idea anyway -
> and there are precompiled binaries available, so it's not hard to get.

Works as in, I'm happy with it. I haven't tested. Though, it'll likely
break some of the old BF animals (temporarily, I hope).

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #7485: 9.2 beta3 libxml2 can't be loaded on Windows
Next
From: psql@elbrief.de
Date:
Subject: Re-2: BUG #7495: chosen wrong index