On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> On 01/31/2013 08:03 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>> Following a quick discussion with Magnus, I've approved all the rest.
>> It's clear that the vast majority of folks here support allowing much
>> more training than we currently do, and as it stands, the policy
>> actually says the moderators may reject more than 4 posts per quarter
>> at their discretion, i.e. accept by default.
>
> Well, more training than we currently do *except for one training
> provider*. I was just checking, and that provider is still posting.
> I'd like, as a moderator, to stick to the policy that we reject more
> than 4 posts per quarter from CertFirst due to the simple reason that,
> as reported, they cancel/reschedule a high proportion of their trainings.
>
> For that matter, if we received a similar report about any other
> training provider, I think we should follow the same policy. Works for
> everybody?
Works for me. Now whether we'll all remember when it matters of course...
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
