On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info> wrote:
>
>
> Le 15/02/2015 22:18, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 4:06 PM, damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info> wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Last time I checked, there's now more that 40 Foreign Data Wrappers in
>>> the wild and the wiki that tries to keep track of everything is kind of
>>> a mess :
>>>
>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers
>>>
>>>
>>> * The page is way too long to scroll
>>> * Separating the "native" FDW from the "multicorn" FDW doesn't really
>>> make sense for the end user.
>>> * For some data source, they are several FDW living their own lives
>>> (mongo for instance)
>>> * For each FDW the data provided can easily be standardized ( data
>>> source, url, PGXN link, comment, etc.) so that each project can be
>>> treated in the same way
>>> * We need to find a unified format to update and maintain this data easily
>>>
>>> So I'd like to start a complete makeover of this page, but before I go
>>> bonkers on the wiki syntax, here's a preview :
>>>
>>> Here's the NoSQL section as it is now :
>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers#NoSQL_Database_Wrappers
>>>
>>> Here's the NoSQL section as I'd like it to be :
>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FDW_v2
>>>
>>> Any comments ?
>>
>> I think that's much better - thanks.
>>
>> Just to note though - EDB took over maintenance of the Mongo FDW from
>> Citus Data, with their approval. You should probably only list that
>> one once.
>>
>
> good to know, I'll update the page.
>
> Does this means that EDB is maintaining the PGXN package as well ?
Yes, I believe that's all been sorted out with David now. I don't know
if a new release has been pushed yet though.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
