On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:43:04PM +0300, Dave Page wrote:
>> > and you are right they didn't upgrade 9.3.X. I am not sure what
>> > requirement we have for packagers listed on our website to have the most
>> > recent versions of _all_ major releases. If they just didn't list
>> > 9.3.X anymore and had the most recent major release available, is that
>> > sufficient? Does someone know? I am CC'ing two of our web people.
>>
>> We certainly expect anything that they list to be up to date, and
>> coordinated with the official release. I don't think we have a policy
>> on which branches should be supported though (perhaps we should - in
>> which case, I'd push for all of them).
>
> OK, should someone contact BigSQL and ask them to either remove the
> 9.3.X release or update it? I can do that.
OK.
> Do we want to require all
> supported branches and check all existing links?
I don't think we've ever required all support branches to be
available, so it wouldn't be fair to ask for that now. I perhaps think
we should for future additions to the page though.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
