On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 03:43:04PM +0300, Dave Page wrote:
> > and you are right they didn't upgrade 9.3.X. I am not sure what
> > requirement we have for packagers listed on our website to have the most
> > recent versions of _all_ major releases. If they just didn't list
> > 9.3.X anymore and had the most recent major release available, is that
> > sufficient? Does someone know? I am CC'ing two of our web people.
>
> We certainly expect anything that they list to be up to date, and
> coordinated with the official release. I don't think we have a policy
> on which branches should be supported though (perhaps we should - in
> which case, I'd push for all of them).
OK, should someone contact BigSQL and ask them to either remove the
9.3.X release or update it? I can do that. Do we want to require all
supported branches and check all existing links?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
