Re: Human readable or full text of xlog (pg_xlog) for vs 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Human readable or full text of xlog (pg_xlog) for vs 9.2
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqHJ=4qVFQ=QskYBCOF5v5vdwCO6-opLFS-D3b6ntHyBBQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Human readable or full text of xlog (pg_xlog) for vs 9.2  (Ash Damle <ash@medgle.com>)
Responses Re: Human readable or full text of xlog (pg_xlog) for vs 9.2  (Ash Damle <ash@medgle.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Ash Damle <ash@medgle.com> wrote:
> WAL was not set or archive ..
>
> Thus I would conclude that PITR was not activated.. correct?
>

Without a WAL archive (that is, archive_mode=on with appropriate
archive_command set), you would not be able to do a PITR.
I think we would have to wait for others to reply on this thread to
point out any others means to recover your data, if any.



--
Amit Langote


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jov
Date:
Subject: Re: Human readable or full text of xlog (pg_xlog) for vs 9.2
Next
From: Ash Damle
Date:
Subject: Re: Human readable or full text of xlog (pg_xlog) for vs 9.2