Re: About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqH6gWisL=PK2EKvOO2RkGXoCo+nAqpMn5YGW8gnKiwg6g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction  (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:
> And it also tells you how to stop it --bibtex iirc
>

Yeah, it's a caution against a potentially harmful usage anyway. Users
should not use it at all.

I was just wondering if the description of the behavior, that is,
potential disappearance of certain locks is complete enough.

--
Amit


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: HOT standby on windows not working
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction