Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction
Date
Msg-id 20140411025247.GC5822@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-docs
Amit Langote wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> wrote:
> > And it also tells you how to stop it --bibtex iirc
>
> Yeah, it's a caution against a potentially harmful usage anyway. Users
> should not use it at all.
>
> I was just wondering if the description of the behavior, that is,
> potential disappearance of certain locks is complete enough.

You do realize that this is no longer the case in 9.3, right?
I don't see a point in changing old releases' documentation.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction