Re: progress report for ANALYZE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqGFPF_OjJ__oUi0biMfaXHH4bLfFjJzQ8NFZnYWkbcdxw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: progress report for ANALYZE  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: progress report for ANALYZE  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 2:52 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:19 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 02:11:10PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > I just pushed this after some small extra tweaks.
> > >
> > > Thanks, Yamada-san, for seeing this to completion!
> >
> > Find attached minor fixes to docs - sorry I didn't look earlier.
> >
> > Possibly you'd also want to change the other existing instances of "preparing
> > to begin".
>
> Spotted a few other issues with the docs:
>
> +       Number of computed extended statistics computed.
>
> Should be: "Number of extended statistics computed."
>
> +     <entry>OID of the child table currently being scanned. This
> field is only valid when
> +       the phase is <literal>computing extended statistics</literal>.
>
> Should be: "This field is only valid when the phase is
> <literal>acquiring inherited sample rows</literal>."
>
> +       durring the table scan.
>
> during
>
> Attached a patch.

Oops, really attached this time.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: walreceiver uses a temporary replication slot by default
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks