Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqG7Jo=1h=4R+PQ79KxrbimMLk5crckXvyxYdsR8xUktAw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Nathan,

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:14 AM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 04:05:30PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > I have pushed 0001 and 0002 now and closed the open items.
>
> There's still an open item for "RI fastpath doesn't call
> ExecutorCheckPerms_hook".  Can that one be marked as resolved?

Sorry, just noticed I had copy-pasted the wrong link for a new item I
added on Tuesday.  The correct link is this:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqE4oLLTJqRA%3DpzahLGcnXVPxgYtNsLvOm_-tW04rOqSXw%40mail.gmail.com

I will push the patch and close this item later today.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a range check on the sequence index from the publisher.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: DSA_ALLOC_NO_OOM vs dsm_create ERROR leaving a half-initialized pgstats hash entry