Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqG2LkDQQLMnLdqeSZN5rbWCC-ue97uPCB2jy36LfZRkbA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 8:53 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:14 AM Nathan Bossart
> <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 04:05:30PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > > I have pushed 0001 and 0002 now and closed the open items.
> >
> > There's still an open item for "RI fastpath doesn't call
> > ExecutorCheckPerms_hook".  Can that one be marked as resolved?
>
> Sorry, just noticed I had copy-pasted the wrong link for a new item I
> added on Tuesday.  The correct link is this:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqE4oLLTJqRA%3DpzahLGcnXVPxgYtNsLvOm_-tW04rOqSXw%40mail.gmail.com
>
> I will push the patch and close this item later today.

Done.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Date:
Subject: Re: aio: worker: Free SMGR objects when idle
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding a stored generated column without long-lived locks