Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqEnp_iLNkSw1HhUUWt6OBuQVr3Y3O6T7s+OFc5GAhGqSg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 4:38 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:48 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 5:43 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
> > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > So, If we want to share the cached partition between statements, we seems cannot
> > > use ExecPartitionCheck. Instead, I tried directly invoke the partition support
> > > function(partsupfunc) to check If the cached info is correct. In this approach I
> > > tried cache the *bound offset* in PartitionDescData, and we can use the bound offset
> > > to get the bound datum from PartitionBoundInfoData and invoke the partsupfunc
> > > to do the CHECK.
> > >
> > > Attach a POC patch about it. Just to share an idea about sharing cached partition info
> > > between statements.
> >
> > I have not looked at your patch yet, but yeah that's what I would
> > imagine doing it.
>
> Just read it and think it looks promising.
>
> On code, I wonder why not add the rechecking-cached-offset code
> directly in get_partiiton_for_tuple(), instead of adding a whole new
> function for that.  Can you please check the attached revised version?

Here's another, slightly more polished version of that. Also, I added
a check_cached parameter to get_partition_for_tuple() to allow the
caller to disable checking the cached version.

-- 
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ajin Cherian
Date:
Subject: Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: security_definer_search_path GUC