Re: adding partitioned tables to publications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rafia Sabih
Subject Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date
Msg-id CA+FpmFfAZ_rs76o1C2-ZuPDYiJ0cOZQ2MqfeWmUpAfhNc5dnSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 06:02, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:

> Rebased and updated to address your comments.
>
+  <para>
+   Partitioned tables are not considered when <literal>FOR ALL TABLES</literal>
+   is specified.
+  </para>
+
What is the reason for above, I mean not for the comment but not
including partitioned tables in for all tables options.


-- 
Regards,
Rafia Sabih



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: reduce size of fmgr_builtins array
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Assert failure due to "drop schema pg_temp_3 cascade" fortemporary tables and \d+ is not showing any info after drooping temp table schema