On 26 October 2011 19:09, fschmidt <fschmidt@gmail.com> wrote:
> But looking at the JDBC code, the main use I see of portals is for
> setFetchSize(). And setFetchSize() is badly crippled in its current
> implementation. Is there any fundamental reason that portals can't be made
> to survive commits, like cursors WITH HOLD? This would result in a
> reasonable implementation of setFetchSize().
That would be nice to have, yes. But it would require a protocol
change which is quite a big thing to do.
Oliver
