Re: search_path vs extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: search_path vs extensions
Date
Msg-id C3A586B5-BDE9-4FAF-8339-C23D6C4BD286@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: search_path vs extensions  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Responses Re: search_path vs extensions  (Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On May 29, 2009, at 3:38 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> PS: we still have to provide users with easy tools to (dynamically)  
> manage search_path, don't we?
> (I prefer not to start the search_path management tool ideas right  
> here).

Yes, we do, and that's what at least half this thread is about.  
Whether or not such tools are put to use for extensions support is a  
separate issue, but both need addressing, I think.

Best,

Davdi


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions
Next
From: Kevin Field
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl error format vs plpgsql error format vs pgTAP