Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From ldh@laurent-hasson.com
Subject Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.
Date
Msg-id BN6PR15MB1185E4664C980E40D1450B06859B0@BN6PR15MB1185.namprd15.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.
List pgsql-performance

Sorry :) When i look at the "SQL" tab in PGAdmin when i select the index in the schema browser. But you are right that /d doesn't show that.


From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 1:34:01 PM
To: ldh@laurent-hasson.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.
 
"ldh@laurent-hasson.com" <ldh@laurent-hasson.com> writes:
> Also, the original statement i implemented did not have all of that. This is the normalized SQL that Postgres now gives when looking at the indices.

[ squint... ]  What do you mean exactly by "Postgres gives that"?
I don't see any redundant COLLATE clauses in e.g. psql \d.

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.
Next
From: "ldh@laurent-hasson.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: Zero throughput on a query on a very large table.